Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 4 results ...

Chen, Y, Wang, W, Zhang, S and You, J (2018) Understanding the multiple functions of construction contracts: the anatomy of FIDIC model contracts. Construction Management and Economics, 36(08), 472–85.

Nguyen, T H D, Chileshe, N and Rameezdeen, R (2018) External stakeholder strategic actions in construction projects: a Vietnamese study. Construction Management and Economics, 36(08), 443–58.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Stakeholder strategic actions; influence strategies; external stakeholders; construction projects; Vietnam;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1432866
  • Abstract:
    Although understanding the influence of external stakeholders is crucial to achieving project success, little attention has been given to investigate their specific influence strategies. Based on a modified theoretical framework, we conducted a multiple-case study to explore common combinations and sequencings of specific actions that these stakeholders take to affect construction projects. Seven specific influence strategies were found: (i) inputs withholding, (ii) inputs compromising, (iii) communication, (iv) direct action, (v) coalition building, (vi) conflict escalation and (vii) credibility building. Stakeholders combined the last five strategies in three pairs persuading decision makers to take action. Coalition building - communication was the most prevalent combination that stakeholders use to influence decision-makers. The combination of communication and credibility building was found in cases having environmental disputes. Direct action and conflict escalation were exerted together in projects affecting the locals adversely. Some common patterns of stakeholder strategic actions were also observed. First, direct action came into existence after communication, followed by conflict escalation. Second, after establishing their credibility via persuasive evidence, experts’ judgements and the like, stakeholders used those outcomes to communicate to decision-makers. We emphasize the need for full and honest engagement with stakeholders to prevent their adverse influence on construction projects.

Thunberg, M and Fredriksson, A (2018) Bringing planning back into the picture – How can supply chain planning aid in dealing with supply chain-related problems in construction?. Construction Management and Economics, 36(08), 425–42.

Yeh, H H (2018) How the capital structure of firms is determined over business cycles: further evidence from the construction industry of Taiwan. Construction Management and Economics, 36(08), 459–71.